BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
PRODID:adamgibbons/ics
METHOD:PUBLISH
X-PUBLISHED-TTL:PT1H
BEGIN:VEVENT
UID:27013@offbeat.amsterdam
SUMMARY:Rethinking freedom in a car centred city
DTSTAMP:20260902T032405Z
DTSTART:20261007T180000Z
DESCRIPTION:Challenging assumptions about the 15-minute city.\n\nFor genera
	tions\, the car stood for independence\, access and freedom. But today\,\n
	as our cities become denser and more complex\, it is worth asking what tha
	t\npromise of freedom really means: how free are we when cars on streets\,
	 crossings\nand carparking dominate the spaces where we live? Join us for 
	a broader and more\nhuman perspective on mobility in the car-centered city
	. Rather than focusing on\none type of transport alone\, we look at the fu
	ll spectrum of everyday movement:\nwalking\, cycling\, public transport\, 
	cars and the many ways people combine them\nin their daily lives. Mobility
	 is never experienced in the same way by everyone\,\nand a route that feel
	s easy and natural to one person may feel confusing\,\nunsafe\, exhausting
	\, or inaccessible to someone else.\n\nTogether with Romee Nicolai Fietsbu
	rgermeester Amsterdam\, BYCS\n[https://www.linkedin.com/in/romee-nicolai-0
	431401ba/] Romy de Reuver Researcher\nat Goudappel [https://www.linkedin.c
	om/in/romy-de-reuver-6643b915a/] Bregtje van\nUffelen Advisor Mobility & S
	pace at Goudappel\n[https://www.linkedin.com/in/bregtje-van-uffelen-372037
	178/] Eric Koomen\nAssociate professor at Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam\n[h
	ttps://www.linkedin.com/in/eric-koomen-b40ab940/]\n\nWe also place this di
	scussion in the context of the 15-minute city. Often\npresented as a pract
	ical and attractive way to organize urban life around\nproximity it is als
	o politically charged and sometimes misunderstood. This\nevening does not 
	entertain these slogans or fears but focuses on what a city\nstructured ar
	ound proximity really delivers for its inhabitants—and the ways\nthis can 
	open alternatives to car – centered mobility. A central part of the\ndiscu
	ssion is the danger of assumptions. Too often\, urban and mobility plannin
	g\nis based on abstract ideas of how people move\, rather than on how peop
	le\nexperience the built environment. We bring in research that helps us b
	etter\nunderstand the psychology of movement\, perception\, and access\, a
	nd asks what\nspatial conditions make people feel safe\, welcome\, and abl
	e to move in different\nways.\n\nDuring the evening\, we will use the Prox
	imity Flower quiz as a tool to explore\nhow different people imagine their
	 ideal city and their preferred relationship\nbetween home\, services\, mo
	bility\, and public space. The flower makes visible\nthat there is no sing
	le universal answer to questions of distance and access.\nPeople have diff
	erent routines\, responsibilities\, cultural backgrounds\, and\nvalues\, a
	nd this shape how they understand the “ideal” city. Researchers from\nthe 
	project groups will also present key findings from their work. These\npres
	entations will offer concrete academic insights into the links between\nmo
	bility\, urban form\, and everyday life\, and will show how research can i
	nform\ndesign\, policy\, and planning. The audience will then be invited t
	o reflect on\nhow these findings relate to their own mobility lifestyles a
	nd to broader\nquestion how we want our cities to function. Ultimately\, j
	oin us to rethink\nfreedom: not as the ability to move primarily by car\, 
	but as the ability to\naccess what you need\, feel at ease in your surroun
	dings\, and participate in\nurban life in different ways. It is about unde
	rstanding how car-centric planning\nhas shaped our cities\, and how a more
	 proximity-based approach can open new\nforms of movement\, inclusion\, an
	d wellbeing.
URL:https://offbeat.amsterdam/event/rethinking-freedom-in-a-car-centred-cit
	y
GEO:52.376857;4.9220756
LOCATION:Pakhuis de Zwijger - Piet Heinkade 179\, 1019 HC Amsterdam
STATUS:CONFIRMED
CATEGORIES:amsterdam-centrum,discussion,eastern docklands,live,physical spa
	ce,quiz
X-ALT-DESC;FMTTYPE=text/html:Challenging assumptions about the 15-minute ci
	ty. <p>For generations, the car stood for independence, access and freedom
	. But today, as our cities become denser and more complex, it is worth ask
	ing what that promise of freedom really means: how free are we when cars o
	n streets, crossings and carparking dominate the spaces where we live? Joi
	n us for a broader and more human perspective on mobility in the car-cente
	red city. Rather than focusing on one type of transport alone, we look at 
	the full spectrum of everyday movement: walking, cycling, public transport
	, cars and the many ways people combine them in their daily lives. Mobilit
	y is never experienced in the same way by everyone, and a route that feels
	 easy and natural to one person may feel confusing, unsafe, exhausting, or
	 inaccessible to someone else.</p>    Together with  <a href="https://www.
	linkedin.com/in/romee-nicolai-0431401ba/" target="_blank">  Romee Nicolai 
	Fietsburgermeester Amsterdam, BYCS  </a> <a href="https://www.linkedin.com
	/in/romy-de-reuver-6643b915a/" target="_blank">  Romy de Reuver Researcher
	 at Goudappel  </a> <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/bregtje-van-uffel
	en-372037178/" target="_blank">  Bregtje van Uffelen Advisor Mobility &amp
	; Space at Goudappel  </a> <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/eric-koome
	n-b40ab940/" target="_blank">  Eric Koomen Associate professor at Vrije Un
	iversiteit Amsterdam  </a>       <p>We also place this discussion in the c
	ontext of the 15-minute city. Often presented as a practical and attractiv
	e way to organize urban life around proximity it is also politically charg
	ed and sometimes misunderstood. This evening does not entertain these slog
	ans or fears but focuses on what a city structured around proximity really
	 delivers for its inhabitants—and the ways this can open alternatives to c
	ar – centered mobility. A central part of the discussion is the danger of 
	assumptions. Too often, urban and mobility planning is based on abstract i
	deas of how people move, rather than on how people experience the built en
	vironment. We bring in research that helps us better understand the psycho
	logy of movement, perception, and access, and asks what spatial conditions
	 make people feel safe, welcome, and able to move in different ways.  </p>
	 <p>During the evening, we will use the Proximity Flower quiz as a tool to
	 explore how different people imagine their ideal city and their preferred
	 relationship between home, services, mobility, and public space. The flow
	er makes visible that there is no single universal answer to questions of 
	distance and access. People have different routines, responsibilities, cul
	tural backgrounds, and values, and this shape how they understand the “ide
	al” city. Researchers from the project groups will also present key findin
	gs from their work. These presentations will offer concrete academic insig
	hts into the links between mobility, urban form, and everyday life, and wi
	ll show how research can inform design, policy, and planning. The audience
	 will then be invited to reflect on how these findings relate to their own
	 mobility lifestyles and to broader question how we want our cities to fun
	ction. Ultimately, join us to rethink freedom: not as the ability to move 
	primarily by car, but as the ability to access what you need, feel at ease
	 in your surroundings, and participate in urban life in different ways. It
	 is about understanding how car-centric planning has shaped our cities, an
	d how a more proximity-based approach can open new forms of movement, incl
	usion, and wellbeing. </p>
BEGIN:VALARM
ACTION:DISPLAY
DESCRIPTION:Rethinking freedom in a car centred city
TRIGGER:-PT1H
END:VALARM
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR
