BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
PRODID:adamgibbons/ics
METHOD:PUBLISH
X-PUBLISHED-TTL:PT1H
BEGIN:VEVENT
UID:27592@offbeat.amsterdam
SUMMARY:CiNEMERCATOR - Louis Theroux My Scientology Movie 2015
DTSTAMP:20260918T204137Z
DTSTART:20260923T180000Z
DESCRIPTION:Filmlover\,\n\n4 cinephiles: [https://www.supermercator.nl/cine
	mercator/team-cinemercator]\n\nMerthe Voorhoeve\,\n\nAndreas van Riet\,\n\
	nMaaike Hasselaar\n\n& Elisabeth van Vliet\,\n\neach are programming 1 pre
	cious film per month. That's 4 precious films per\nmonth!\n\nCiNEMERCATOR\
	n\ndoors open 19:00\n\nstart 20:00\n\nticket 3€\n\n23-9\n\nLouis Theroux\n
	\nMy Scientology Movie\n\n2015\n\nLouis Theroux has always been drawn to p
	eople who inhabit their own private\nweather systems. Before My Scientolog
	y Movie\, his documentaries had already made\na speciality of entering str
	ange subcultures without quite knowing whether he\nwas interviewing them o
	r being absorbed by them. His method is deceptively mild\;\ncuriosity as a
	 kind of soft instrument of pressure.\n\nIn My Scientology Movie\, directe
	d by John Dower\, that method meets an\norganisation whose doors are famou
	sly difficult to open. When Scientology\nrefuses Theroux access\, he does 
	something characteristically mischievous\; he\nreconstructs it from the ou
	tside\, employing actors\, former members and the\nfilmmaker Adam S. Meyer
	 to stage scenes of Scientology life. The imitation\nbecomes the investiga
	tion.\n\nThis gives the film its peculiar\, almost Kafkaesque energy. Agai
	n and again\,\nTheroux discovers that reality is less stable than the perf
	ormance designed to\nrepresent it. His replicas are sometimes absurd\, som
	etimes unsettling\; meanwhile\nthe refusal to participate becomes its own 
	kind of presence.\n\nThe result is not a comprehensive examination of Scie
	ntology so much as a film\nabout what happens when an institution refuses 
	to be filmed. Theroux's gentle\nbewilderment becomes the central instrumen
	t. He does not break through the wall.\nHe walks around it\, tapping exper
	imentally\, until the wall begins to sound\nhollow.\n\nThis film is chosen
	 by Maaike\n[https://www.supermercator.nl/cinemercator/team-cinemercator]\
	n\n30-9\n\nAlfred Hitchcok\n\nROPE\n\n1948\n\nThere is a corpse\, a length
	 of rope and an apartment in which nobody seems to\nconsider the obvious s
	olution: opening a window and taking a very long breath.\n\nTwo young men\
	, Brandon and Phillip have murdered a former classmate. Not out of\npassio
	n\, revenge or self-defence\, but as an intellectual exercise. They want t
	o\nprove that certain superior people might have the right to kill inferio
	r ones.\nThen they throw a dinner party. This is roughly the equivalent of
	 robbing a bank\nand inviting the police over for champagne afterwards.\n\
	nThe real brilliance of Rope lies less in the plot than in its spatial tra
	p.\nAlmost the entire film takes place inside one apartment. Hitchcock’s c
	amera\ndrifts through the rooms\, passing behind characters and pieces of 
	furniture\,\ncreating the sensation that the whole thing is happening in o
	ne continuous take.\nOf course it isn't. The cuts are simply disguised. Th
	e film is\, in a sense\,\nlying about its own construction- which is rathe
	r appropriate for a story about\npeople trying to construct their own real
	ity.\n\nWhat makes Rope so deliciously uncomfortable is that the murderers
	 don't\nultimately collapse because their grand philosophy is defeated in 
	some\nspectacular intellectual duel. They collapse because human beings ar
	e terrible\nat maintaining a perfect fiction. They sweat. They drink. They
	 contradict\nthemselves. They become vain. They say too much.\n\nRope is n
	ot a flawless film. Its theatricality occasionally becomes very visible\na
	nd its technical experiment can feel like an experiment. But that artifici
	ality\nis also what makes it fascinating. Hitchcock doesn't try to hide th
	e fact that\nwe're watching a constructed stage. He turns the apartment in
	to a kind of\npressure chamber\, where every movement and every pause acqu
	ires suspicious\nsignificance. The murderers have hidden the body. Hitchco
	ck has hidden the cuts.\nEventually\, you realise that both are becoming i
	ncreasingly difficult to keep\nhidden.\n\nThis film is chosen by Elisabeth
	\n[https://www.supermercator.nl/cinemercator/team-cinemercator]\n\n1-10\n\
	nMichelangelo Antonioni\n\nL'Avventura\n\n1960\n\nMichelangelo Antonioni\,
	 one of the great architects of modern European cinema\,\nhad little inter
	est in making films behave properly. After beginning in the\norbit of Ital
	ian neorealism\, he gradually turned his attention away from social\nreali
	ty and towards the private landscapes of disconnection\, desire and boredo
	m.\nL’Avventura (1960) is the film where that language fully crystallises\
	; the first\npart of the loose trilogy completed by La notte and L’eclisse
	.\n\nIt begins with a disappearance and then\, rather perversely\, loses i
	nterest in\nsolving it. Anna vanishes from a small island\; her friends se
	arch for her\, but\nthe real subject gradually becomes the strange emotion
	al vacuum her absence\nexposes.\n\nAntonioni’s revolution is almost embarr
	assingly simple: he lets nothing happen\nfor long enough that we are force
	d to notice everything else. Architecture\,\nbodies\, silences\, the geome
	try of a room- all become more expressive than\ndialogue. Monica Vitti and
	 Gabriele Ferzetti move through the film like people\ntrying to remember w
	hat desire is supposed to feel like.\n\nIt’s often called a film about ali
	enation\, which is true but not quite\nsufficient. L’Avventura is less int
	erested in loneliness than in the peculiar\nboredom of people who can no l
	onger tell what they want. The missing woman\nbecomes almost incidental. W
	hat disappears instead is certainty about love\,\nmorality\, narrative- ev
	en cinema itself.\n\nNo wonder the film caused such a stir at Cannes in 19
	60\, where it received the\nJury Prize. Antonioni had made a mystery in wh
	ich the mystery itself slowly\nbecomes irrelevant. And he is perfectly hap
	py to leave the hole open.\n\nThis film is chosen by Andreas\n[https://www
	.supermercator.nl/cinemercator/team-cinemercator]\n\nDo you want to receiv
	e our\n\nmonthly program? [https://youtu.be/OIih0YACWRI?is=pOLH3tbmPz50rSO
	g]\n\nSend 'show me your movies' to [cinemercator@gmail.com]:\n\ncinemerca
	tor@gmail.com [cinemercator@gmail.com]\n\narchive [https://www.supermercat
	or.nl/cinemercator/cinemercator-a-r-c-h-i-v-e]
URL:https://offbeat.amsterdam/event/cinemercator-louis-theroux-my-scientolo
	gy-movie-2015
GEO:52.3689648;4.8512865
LOCATION:Supermercator - Mercatorplein 3H\, 1057 BX Amsterdam
STATUS:CONFIRMED
CATEGORIES:amsterdam-west,de-baarsjes,dinner,documentary,film,opening,oud-w
	est,party,performance,stories
X-ALT-DESC;FMTTYPE=text/html:<p> Filmlover, </p><p><a href="https://www.sup
	ermercator.nl/cinemercator/team-cinemercator">4 cinephiles: </a></p><p>Mer
	the Voorhoeve, </p><p>Andreas van Riet, </p><p>Maaike Hasselaar </p><p>&am
	p; Elisabeth van Vliet,</p><p>each are programming 1 precious film per mon
	th. That's 4 precious films per month!</p><p>CiNEMERCATOR</p><p> doors ope
	n 19:00 </p><p> start 20:00</p><p> ticket 3€</p><p>23-9</p><p>Louis Therou
	x</p><p>My Scientology Movie</p><p>2015</p><p>Louis Theroux has always bee
	n drawn to people who inhabit their own private weather systems. Before <e
	m>My Scientology Movie</em>, his documentaries had already made a speciali
	ty of entering strange subcultures without quite knowing whether he was in
	terviewing them or being absorbed by them. His method is deceptively mild;
	 curiosity as a kind of soft instrument of pressure.</p><p>In <em>My Scien
	tology Movie</em>, directed by John Dower, that method meets an organisati
	on whose doors are famously difficult to open. When Scientology refuses Th
	eroux access, he does something characteristically mischievous; he reconst
	ructs it from the outside, employing actors, former members and the filmma
	ker Adam S. Meyer to stage scenes of Scientology life. The imitation becom
	es the investigation.</p><p>This gives the film its peculiar, almost Kafka
	esque energy. Again and again, Theroux discovers that reality is less stab
	le than the performance designed to represent it. His replicas are sometim
	es absurd, sometimes unsettling; meanwhile the refusal to participate beco
	mes its own kind of presence.</p><p>The result is not a comprehensive exam
	ination of Scientology so much as a film about what happens when an instit
	ution refuses to be filmed. Theroux's gentle bewilderment becomes the cent
	ral instrument. He does not break through the wall. He walks around it, ta
	pping experimentally, until the wall begins to sound hollow.</p><p><em>Thi
	s film is chosen by </em><a href="https://www.supermercator.nl/cinemercato
	r/team-cinemercator"><em>Maaike</em></a></p><p>30-9</p><p>Alfred Hitchcok<
	/p><p>ROPE</p><p>1948</p><p>There is a corpse, a length of rope and an apa
	rtment in which nobody seems to consider the obvious solution: opening a w
	indow and taking a very long breath.</p><p>Two young men, Brandon and Phil
	lip have murdered a former classmate. Not out of passion, revenge or self-
	defence, but as an intellectual exercise. They want to prove that certain 
	superior people might have the right to kill inferior ones. Then they thro
	w a dinner party. This is roughly the equivalent of robbing a bank and inv
	iting the police over for champagne afterwards.</p><p>The real brilliance 
	of <em>Rope</em> lies less in the plot than in its spatial trap. Almost th
	e entire film takes place inside one apartment. Hitchcock’s camera drifts 
	through the rooms, passing behind characters and pieces of furniture, crea
	ting the sensation that the whole thing is happening in one continuous tak
	e. Of course it isn't. The cuts are simply disguised. The film is, in a se
	nse, lying about its own construction- which is rather appropriate for a s
	tory about people trying to construct their own reality.</p><p>What makes 
	<em>Rope</em> so deliciously uncomfortable is that the murderers don't ult
	imately collapse because their grand philosophy is defeated in some specta
	cular intellectual duel. They collapse because human beings are terrible a
	t maintaining a perfect fiction. They sweat. They drink. They contradict t
	hemselves. They become vain. They say too much.</p><p><em>Rope</em> is not
	 a flawless film. Its theatricality occasionally becomes very visible and 
	its technical experiment can feel like an experiment. But that artificiali
	ty is also what makes it fascinating. Hitchcock doesn't try to hide the fa
	ct that we're watching a constructed stage. He turns the apartment into a 
	kind of pressure chamber, where every movement and every pause acquires su
	spicious significance. The murderers have hidden the body. Hitchcock has h
	idden the cuts. Eventually, you realise that both are becoming increasingl
	y difficult to keep hidden.</p><p><em>This film is chosen by </em><a href=
	"https://www.supermercator.nl/cinemercator/team-cinemercator"><em>Elisabet
	h</em></a></p><p>1-10</p><p>Michelangelo Antonioni</p><p>L'Avventura</p><p
	>1960</p><p>Michelangelo Antonioni, one of the great architects of modern 
	European cinema, had little interest in making films behave properly. Afte
	r beginning in the orbit of Italian neorealism, he gradually turned his at
	tention away from social reality and towards the private landscapes of dis
	connection, desire and boredom. <em>L’Avventura</em> (1960) is the film wh
	ere that language fully crystallises; the first part of the loose trilogy 
	completed by <em>La notte</em> and <em>L’eclisse</em>.</p><p>It begins wit
	h a disappearance and then, rather perversely, loses interest in solving i
	t. Anna vanishes from a small island; her friends search for her, but the 
	real subject gradually becomes the strange emotional vacuum her absence ex
	poses.</p><p>Antonioni’s revolution is almost embarrassingly simple: he le
	ts nothing happen for long enough that we are forced to notice everything 
	else. Architecture, bodies, silences, the geometry of a room- all become m
	ore expressive than dialogue. Monica Vitti and Gabriele Ferzetti move thro
	ugh the film like people trying to remember what desire is supposed to fee
	l like.</p><p>It’s often called a film about alienation, which is true but
	 not quite sufficient. <em>L’Avventura</em> is less interested in loneline
	ss than in the peculiar boredom of people who can no longer tell what they
	 want. The missing woman becomes almost incidental. What disappears instea
	d is certainty about love, morality, narrative- even cinema itself.</p><p>
	No wonder the film caused such a stir at Cannes in 1960, where it received
	 the Jury Prize. Antonioni had made a mystery in which the mystery itself 
	slowly becomes irrelevant. And he is perfectly happy to leave the hole ope
	n.</p><p>This film is chosen by <a href="https://www.supermercator.nl/cine
	mercator/team-cinemercator">Andreas</a></p><p>Do you want to receive our <
	/p><p><a href="https://youtu.be/OIih0YACWRI?is=pOLH3tbmPz50rSOg" target="_
	blank">monthly program?</a></p><p><a href="mailto:cinemercator@gmail.com" 
	target="_blank">Send <em>'show me your movies'</em> to</a>:</p><p><a href=
	"mailto:cinemercator@gmail.com" target="_blank">cinemercator@gmail.com</a>
	</p><p><a href="https://www.supermercator.nl/cinemercator/cinemercator-a-r
	-c-h-i-v-e"> <em>archive</em></a></p>
BEGIN:VALARM
ACTION:DISPLAY
DESCRIPTION:CiNEMERCATOR - Louis Theroux My Scientology Movie 2015
TRIGGER:-PT1H
END:VALARM
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR
